Education · head-to-head
coilbook™ | Learning For Children VS 
Science Channel
Two education channels, compared on the numbers that actually move a video rather than subscriber vanity. coilbook™ | Learning For Children sits at 5.9M subscribers with a typical 19M views per upload; Science Channel at 5.3M with about 41K. Below is the full head-to-head plus the titles that win for each.
On this data coilbook™ | Learning For Children is the stronger performer of the two - it wins on both consistency (a 36% hit-rate, i.e. how often an upload beats 2x its own median) and reach (19M median views). The other channel isn't behind on size so much as on how reliably its uploads land.
| Metric | coilbook™ | Learning For Children | Science Channel |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 5.9M | 5.3M |
| Median views / video | 19M | 41K |
| Hit-rate (beats 2x median) | 36% | 35% |
| Top-video share | 46% | 62% |
| Est. ad revenue / mo | $12K–$49K | $1K–$4K |
| Uploads / week | 0.1 | 4.2 |
| Typical length | 10 min | 26 min |
| Started | 2011 | 2006 |
The words that keep showing up in each channel's winning titles differ too: coilbook™ | Learning For Children leans on real city, city heroes, heroes rch, sergeant cooper, while Science Channel leans on universe works, through wormhole, mysteries abandoned, delicious foods. Open either channel for the full breakdown of what wins versus flops.